Virtualization has become essential for optimizing resources and running multiple operating systems on a single device. In the modern world, Oracle and VMware are the two leaders who provide virtualization solutions. For running virtual machines oracle provides a virtual box as a hypervisor. While VMware provides multiple products for running VMs in different use cases. Both platforms have interesting features. They are fast & reliable. There are many common features and some are unique to each platform. If you have to choose between these two, then the decision would be so difficult. In this article, you will find the difference between VMware and Virtualbox.
VMware was launched in 1998. It comes to the desktop variations of VMware. They usually run successfully on Linux, Windows & MAC OS. However, the server variations of VMware can also run on the server immediately. And that too, with no requirement of the working system because hypervisor experience is used for them. Moreover, the workstations of VMware allow the working of the various working packages of x86 or x86-64.
On the other hand, the Virtual Box was launched by Oracle. Usually, It is the very best current working system & with the help of this virtualization bundle, many other kinds of working packages could also be loaded on the system & run. Mostly, Virtual Box assists the MAC, Linux, and Windows. This is how it really works. Virtual is called the perfect virtualization software program and it is used by many individuals on the globe for a protracted time interval.
Here is the comparison table for your clear understanding of their differences:
| Factors | VMware | Virtual Box |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | A proprietary virtualization platform with a suite of tools for various use cases. | An open-source virtualization tool developed by Oracle. |
| Primary Purpose | Focuses on private cloud setup, endpoint protection, and enterprise-level management. | A versatile tool for developers, widely used for testing and development environments. |
| Operating Systems | Works on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Server versions run directly without needing a host OS. | Supports Windows, Linux, Solaris, and macOS as host systems. |
| Cost | VMware Workstation and Fusion are paid tools; free options like VMware Player exist. | Free and open-source, but a license is required for commercial use on multiple devices. |
| Features | Advanced features like endpoint security, private cloud management, and mobile device management. | Includes features like USB support, Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP), and Preboot Execution Environment (PXE). |
| Performance | Offers better performance for enterprise tasks and server environments. | Suitable for personal and development use; performance may lag in enterprise scenarios. |
| Ease of Access | Provides a more user-friendly interface and seamless integration. | Slightly less intuitive compared to VMware. |
| Cloud Integration | Offers robust tools for cloud management and enterprise applications. | Primarily used for local virtualization and development purposes. |
| Customization | Limited flexibility in customizations, as it focuses on enterprise needs. | Allows more customizations, making it ideal for developers. |
Both VMware and VirtualBox cater to different user needs. Choose VMware if you need enterprise-level virtualization with robust features. Or, opt for VirtualBox if you're a developer or looking for a free and versatile virtualization tool. Go through the comparison done above and evaluate your specific requirements, such as cost, features, and performance, before making your decision.